What Drives Firms to Enter Carbon Market? An Experimental Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61459/ijfs.v2i2.70Keywords:
Carbon Market, Regulatory Pressure, Financial Incentive, International TradingAbstract
Carbon exchange is a very new issue in Indonesia. Therefore, understanding the potential of carbon exchange to realize Net-Zero Emission is crucial. This study explores the factors that can encourage companies to enter the carbon exchange by understanding behavioral and non-behavioral factors. Psychological theory is also used to explain the motivation of corporate managers in making strategic decisions. This study is a quantitative study using experiments. The experimental design used is 2x2x2 between subjects. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results of this study indicate that regulatory pressure, financial incentives, and international trade are factors that can encourage companies to enter the carbon exchange/carbon market. In addition, carbon trading is unable to outperform carbon taxes in the short term due to cost efficiency and investment costs in companies. In addition, this study can be a reference for policy makers to optimize the role of IDXCarbon in carrying out its functions and encourage more companies to be involved in carbon exchange trading to realize Net-Zero Emission by 2060.
Downloads
References
Aamaas, B., & Grimsby, L. K. (2024). The impact on climate and emissions of clean household cooking energy policies in Tanzania. Energy Policy, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114211
Abadie, A., Chowdhury, S., Mangla, S. K., & Malik, S. (2024). Impact of carbon offset perceptions on greenwashing: Revealing intentions and strategies through an experimental approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 117, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.001
Bi, Q., Feng, S., Qu, T., Ye, P., & Liu, Z. (2024). Is the green innovation under the pressure of new environmental protection law of PRC substantive green innovation. Energy Policy, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114227
Cao, J., Ho, M. S., Jorgenson, D. W., & Nielsen, C. P. (2019). China’s emissions trading system and an ETS-carbon tax hybrid. Energy Economics, 81, 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.04.029
Chen, J., Shen, L., Song, X., Shi, Q., & Li, S. (2017). An empirical study on the CO2 emissions in the Chinese construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.072
Chen, S., Shi, A., & Wang, X. (2020). Carbon emission curbing effects and influencing mechanisms of China’s Emission Trading Scheme: The mediating roles of technique effect, composition effect and allocation effect. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121700
Cheng, B., Dai, H., Wang, P., Zhao, D., & Masui, T. (2015). Impacts of carbon trading scheme on air pollutant emissions in Guangdong Province of China. Energy for Sustainable Development, 27, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.06.001
Du, Q., Yang, M., Wang, Y., Wang, X., & Dong, Y. (2024). Dynamic simulation for carbon emission reduction effects of the prefabricated building supply chain under environmental policies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.105027
Egenhofer, Christian. (2011). The EU Emissions Trading System and climate policy towards 2050 : real incentives to reduce emissions and drive innovation? Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS).
Etienne, J., Balme, R., Borraz, O., Bourrier, M., Gilad, S., Giraud, O., Hutter, B., Le Galès, P., Lindenberg, S., Mitchell, R., & Parker, C. (2011). Compliance Theory: A Goal Framing Approach. LAW & POLICY, 33(3).
Gezelius, S. S., & Hauck, M. (2011). Toward a Theory of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods: A Comparative Study of Compliance Motivations in Developed and Developing World Fisheries The Question of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods. Law and Society Association, 45(2), 435–470.
Goodwin, D., Gale, F., Lovell, H., Beasy, K., Murphy, H., & Schoen, M. (2024). Sustainability certification for renewable hydrogen: An international survey of energy professionals. Energy Policy, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114231
Grieder, M. ;, Baerenbold, R. ;, Schmitz, J. ;, Schubert, R., Grieder, M., Baerenbold, R., Schmitz, J., Faust, K., Goetz, A., Mayr, H., & Stefan, M. (2022). Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: The Behavioral Effects of Carbon Taxes-Experimental Evidence. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/264112
Hao, Y., Tian, C., & Wu, C. (2020). Modelling of carbon price in two real carbon trading markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118556
He, Q., Wu, J., Wu, Z., Zhang, J., & Chen, X. (2024). Evolutionary game analysis of prefabricated buildings adoption under carbon emission trading scheme. Building and Environment, 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.111121
Heintzman, P. (2021). The potential for voluntary carbon offset programs in the Canadian snow-based outdoor recreation industry. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2021.100422
Jotzo, F. (2013). Emissions Trading in China: Principles, Design Options and Lessons from International Practice. In Centre for Climate Economics & Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy. The Australian National University.
Linden, J., O’Donoghue, C., & Sologon, D. M. (2024). The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason. Energy Policy, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114210
Liyanarachchi, G., & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistle-blowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9983-x
Luo, W., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Shi, C., & Wang, Y. (2021). Life cycle carbon cost of buildings under carbon trading and carbon tax system in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102509
Miceli, M.P., Near, J.P. & Dworkin, T. M. (2008). A word to the wise: how managers and policymakers can encourage employees to report wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9853-6
Nahartyo, E. (2013). Desain dan implementasi riset eksperimen (2nd ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.
Oyanedel, R., Gelcich, S., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2020). A synthesis of (non-)compliance theories with applications to small-scale fisheries research and practice. Fish and Fisheries, 21(6), 1120–1134. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12490
Peat, D., Fikfak, V., & Van Der Zee, E. (2022). Behavioural Compliance Theory. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 13(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idab033
Royapoor M., Du H., Wade N., Goldstein M., Roskilly T., Taylor P., & Walker S. (2019). Carbon mitigation unit costs of building retrofits and the scope for carbon tax, a case study. Energy and Buildings, 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109415
Shankar, R., & Gupta, L. (2024). An integrated AI framework for managing organizational risk and climate change concerns in B2B market. Industrial Marketing Management, 117, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.12.019
Shen, L., Song, X., Wu, Y., Liao, S., & Zhang, X. (2016). Interpretive Structural Modeling based factor analysis on the implementation of Emission Trading System in the Chinese building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.151
Song, Y., & Liu, Y. (2024). Empirical analysis of the relationship between carbon trading price and stock price of high carbon emitting firms based on VAR model - evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 31(1), 1146–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30906-w
Truong-Dinh, B. Q., Nguyen, T. T., Cheng, T. C. F., & Cheng, J. M. S. (2023). Effects of consumer perceptions on carbon-offset payment through mediating and moderating mechanisms. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103584
Tsai, W. H. (2020). Carbon emission reduction-carbon tax, carbon trading, and carbon offset. In Energies (Vol. 13, Issue 22). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13226128
Wang, H., Chen, Z., Wu, X., & Nie, X. (2019). Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? —Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method. Energy Policy, 129, 930–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.007
Wang, X., Huang, J., & Liu, H. (2022). Can China’s carbon trading policy help achieve Carbon Neutrality? — A study of policy effects from the Five-sphere Integrated Plan perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114357
Wang, Y., Sun, X., & Guo, X. (2019). Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from OECD industrial sectors. Energy Policy, 132, 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.016
Wijayanti, D. M., & Yandra, F. P. (2020). The Role of Incentives, Emotional Connection, and Organizational Justice in Establishing an Effective Whistleblowing System: An Experimental Study. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 7(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v7i1.14178
Wixted, J. T. , & Gaitan, S. C. (2022). Cognitive theories as reinforcement history surrogates: The case of likelihood ratio models ff human recognition memory. . Animal Learning & Behavior, 30(4), 289–305.
Worrall, F., Evans, M. G., Bonn, A., Reed, M. S., Chapman, D., & Holden, J. (2009). Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration? Science of the Total Environment, 408(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.022
Xu, W., & Li, M. (2024). Green tax system and corporate carbon emissions–a quasi-natural experiment based on the environmental protection tax law. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2024.2307524
Zhang, C., Wang, Q., Shi, D., Li, P., & Cai, W. (2016). Scenario-based potential effects of carbon trading in China: An integrated approach. Applied Energy, 182, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.133
Zhang, H., & Zhang, B. (2020). The unintended impact of carbon trading of China’s power sector. Energy Policy, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111876
Zhang, W., Zhang, N., & Yu, Y. (2019). Carbon mitigation effects and potential cost savings from carbon emissions trading in China’s regional industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.014
Zhang, Y. J., Liang, T., Jin, Y. L., & Shen, B. (2020). The impact of carbon trading on economic output and carbon emissions reduction in China’s industrial sectors. Applied Energy, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114290
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2019). Estimating the impacts of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117913
Zhu, B., Zhang, M., Huang, L., Wang, P., Su, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2020). Exploring the effect of carbon trading mechanism on China’s green development efficiency: A novel integrated approach. Energy Economics, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104601
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The International Journal of Financial Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IJFS article's license is CC-BY-NC. Authors grant the journal/publisher publishing rights with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.